With the rapid development of autonomous driving, everyone is saying it's indispensable. But for me, highway NOA is enough—urban NOA is more of a hassle. Without highway NOA, long drives are exhausting; I can't do without this feature. However, urban NOA isn't as reassuring. Even with highway NOA, I set the driving style to relatively conservative—I don’t let the car weave through traffic. Highway NOA provides tremendous convenience on long trips, partially freeing my hands, feet, and mind during high-speed driving, reducing fatigue. But urban NOA has many aspects that make it hard to fully trust. From my personal experience, while urban NOA has some advantages—like significantly improved smart control, higher accuracy in recognizing traffic lights and obstacles, and smoother acceleration/braking for better comfort—its drawbacks are obvious. The exit boundaries of urban NOA aren’t clear enough, making it hard to gauge trustworthiness. It struggles to prevent cut-ins, which is frustrating. Recognition of obstacles and sharp turns lags, causing unconfident deceleration, indicating insufficient model training. Highway NOA doesn’t have these troubling issues—its scenarios are simpler, requiring attention only in difficult situations, making high-speed driving more reassuring. For me, highway NOA is already sufficient, while urban NOA still can’t truly put me at ease.