Listening along, the following scene appeared in my mind:

Looking back at World War I history now, we say the "Sarajevo Incident" was the trigger, how they negotiated, then fought, then negotiated again; later generations from different disciplines came in to analyze, applying different rules, the era of modeling 1.0.

World War II, the Blitzkrieg on Poland, and the many preparations and minor incidents before that, localized hot wars, alliances, war, negotiations, fighting again, more negotiations. The era of modeling 2.0.

Reading from history books, watching documentaries, zooming in on certain points within an event in movies, it's all just using our minutes, tens of minutes, hours, days of time.

Looking at Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Palestine today, it feels endless, with constant and huge fluctuations; if we look back at everything today from a historical perspective fifty years later, it will also just be a record of minutes, tens of minutes, hours, days. So what's irrational about it? The era of modeling 3.0 is underway.

Back to the present, then, when you're in the midst of it, many ups and downs of emotional fluctuations, take them calmly, the era of modeling 3.0 has just begun to be significant; the entry points for buying, taking profits, and cutting losses, and the subsequent thoughts of "bought too little, sold too early, bought at a loss" might automatically disappear. Looking at it again within the framework of grand history will have a different meaning. Ultimately, how one understands the meaning of investment to oneself will be different.

The above may seem unrelated to specific investments, but one of the good effects of sharing is to activate the brain.

Thank you @京城Z先生